Publications associated with Climate Processes


Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions Copernicus GmbH (2019) 1-18

E Gryspeerdt, J Mülmenstädt, A Gettelman, FF Malavelle, H Morrison, D Neubauer, DG Partridge, P Stier, T Takemura, H Wang, M Wang, K Zhang

<jats:p>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract.&lt;/strong&gt; The radiative forcing from aerosols (particularly through their interaction with clouds) remains one of the most uncertain components of the human forcing of the climate. Observation-based studies have typically found a smaller aerosol effective radiative forcing than in model simulations and were given preferential weighting in the IPCC AR5 report. With their own sources of uncertainty, it is not clear that observation-based estimates are more reliable. Understanding the source of the model-observational difference is thus vital to reduce uncertainty in the impact of aerosols on the climate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;These reported discrepancies arise from the different decompositions of the aerosol forcing used in model and observational studies. Applying the observational decomposition to global climate model output, the two different lines of evidence are surprisingly similar, with a much better agreement on the magnitude of aerosol impacts on cloud properties. Cloud adjustments remain a significant source of uncertainty, particularly for ice clouds. However, they are consistent with the uncertainty from observation-based methods, with the liquid water path adjustment usually enhancing the Twomey effect by less than 50&amp;amp;thinsp;%. Depending on different sets of assumptions, this work suggests that model and observation-based estimates could be more equally weighted in future synthesis studies.&lt;/p&gt; </jats:p>


Show full publication list